News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:“Close to tears, he left at the intermission”: how Kubric... by arca_vorago on Saturday April 07, 2018 @04:05PM (#16782591)
"Descending into lava lamps and nonsense." is hardly what I'd call it. Kubrick is all about subtext.
Re:“Close to tears, he left at the intermission”: how Kubric... by interfixus on Saturday April 07, 2018 @04:16PM (#16782661)
I know I am supposed to find it deep and like it to the bitter end. And boy have I tried.

There'a lot of Kubrick I don't get. I have actually read A Clockwork Orange, the novel, and liked it despite its Burgessian lapsed catholic babble, but I intensely dislike the movie.

And don't get me started on The Shining.

Re:“Close to tears, he left at the intermission”: how Kubric... by arca_vorago on Saturday April 07, 2018 @04:40PM (#16782824)
What did you think of the ending difference between the book and the movie in ACO?
Re:“Close to tears, he left at the intermission”: how Kubric... by interfixus on Saturday April 07, 2018 @04:56PM (#16782928)
Conflicted, actually, as I would have to aggree with the American expurgation of the last chapter from the novel, but I sort of feel I have to take the author's view as canonical - and Burgess famously disliked the redaction.

Anyway, I gave up on deeper meaning in Burgess' work a long, long time ago. I still read him with great pleasure, but that's for the linguistic fireworks and his steamrolling, gutpunching flair for telling a story so you hear the sounds and smell the smells.