Re:“Close to tears, he left at the intermission”: how Kubric...
by arca_vorago on Saturday April 07, 2018 @04:05PM
(#16782591)
"Descending into lava lamps and nonsense." is hardly what I'd call it. Kubrick is all about subtext.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:“Close to tears, he left at the intermission”: how Kubric...
by interfixus on Saturday April 07, 2018 @04:16PM
(#16782661)
I know I am supposed to find it deep and like it to the bitter end. And boy have I tried.
There'a lot of Kubrick I don't get. I have actually read A Clockwork Orange, the novel, and liked it despite its Burgessian lapsed catholic babble, but I intensely dislike the movie.
And don't get me started on The Shining.
Re:“Close to tears, he left at the intermission”: how Kubric...
by arca_vorago on Saturday April 07, 2018 @04:40PM
(#16782824)
What did you think of the ending difference between the book and the movie in ACO?
Re:“Close to tears, he left at the intermission”: how Kubric...
by interfixus on Saturday April 07, 2018 @04:56PM
(#16782928)
Conflicted, actually, as I would have to aggree with the American expurgation of the last chapter from the novel, but I sort of feel I have to take the author's view as canonical - and Burgess famously disliked the redaction.
Anyway, I gave up on deeper meaning in Burgess' work a long, long time ago. I still read him with great pleasure, but that's for the linguistic fireworks and his steamrolling, gutpunching flair for telling a story so you hear the sounds and smell the smells.