Re:Google seeks to limit ‘right to be forgotten’ by claiming...
by astura on Friday April 06, 2018 @07:39PM
(#16778466)
Saying "X was convicted of Y" is not a "false claim," when X really was convicted of Y. If X's conviction is later overturned, that's additional information, but it doesn't make the original information false.
Nobody owes anyone an apology.