Re:Google seeks to limit ‘right to be forgotten’ by claiming...
by joshuamorton on Friday April 06, 2018 @07:00PM
(#16778227)
>If you can prevent a journalists' article from ever being found, you have effectively censored it.
Oh this I 100% agree with. Information isn't information if it can't be found. (And noting that I'm employed by Google) I don't at all find the argument that "we can't prevent you from publishing something, but we can prevent it from being accessed" not compelling. Does it apply to newspaper anthologies or hard copy aggregation?
Oh this I 100% agree with. Information isn't information if it can't be found. (And noting that I'm employed by Google) I don't at all find the argument that "we can't prevent you from publishing something, but we can prevent it from being accessed" not compelling. Does it apply to newspaper anthologies or hard copy aggregation?