Re:Google seeks to limit ‘right to be forgotten’ by claiming...
by acqq on Friday April 06, 2018 @05:35PM
(#16777659)
If you just speak about the positive aspects, you obviously never compared what you surely know to be truth, related to some "controversial" topic, with what some other people get when they search for the same topic, especially those who have different opinion of what "the truth" is.
Not counting that even that "magnification of the confirmation" is additionally modified for some topics by the "editorial" policies of Google.
Re:Google seeks to limit ‘right to be forgotten’ by claiming...
by gray_-_wolf on Friday April 06, 2018 @05:45PM
(#16777746)
> That said, it would be nice if there was an easy way to turn off this search personalization on a search-by-search basis
it is, it's called anonymous window
Re:Google seeks to limit ‘right to be forgotten’ by claiming...
by bringtheaction on Friday April 06, 2018 @08:34PM
(#16778708)
You are talking about incognito mode / private browsing right?
When I open an incognito tab and search for “latex”, the entire first page of results is still all about LaTeX for me and I would bet my left hand that this is not universally true.
In other words, you are still seeing personalized results.
Re:Google seeks to limit ‘right to be forgotten’ by claiming...
by obmelvin on Saturday April 07, 2018 @02:57PM
(#16782173)
Yup, I tried the same thing. I would guess they are still doing some sort of server-side personalization and/or identification, they just don't continue to track you via cookies. For me it wasn't that surprising, I tried doing this from an IP address associated with a large CS dept.
That said, it would be nice if there was an easy way to turn off this search personalization on a search-by-search basis in a similar manner to how one can look for results from a certain time period