News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Don’t Fix Facebook, Replace It by soapdog on Thursday April 05, 2018 @10:50AM (#16765396)
Hey I Love Scuttlebutt, I am actually writing a client for it. But I don't think the objective here is privacy. If I follow you on ssb, I will start replicating your feed (unless you block me), and all you post publicly will be in my own HD which I could use to generate some "intelligence". There are no incentives in ssb for those marketing type actions we see on FB and Twitter but we can still mine it. Of course your private communication is private, but the public feed is very public.
Re:Don’t Fix Facebook, Replace It by fenwick67 on Thursday April 05, 2018 @11:47AM (#16765960)
SSB does support encrypted private messaging, notably.

You could send a private message to a group of (7 or fewer) friends and then only they could open it.

Re:Don’t Fix Facebook, Replace It by soapdog on Friday April 06, 2018 @09:31AM (#16773044)
yes and as far as I know there is work being done to make private channels a thing. So in the near future, private conversation might be able to include more than 7 people.

I just have this feeling that people sometimes talk about SSB as if it is like "private by default" and thats not really the case, public feed is quite public (and I don't think that is bad).

I for example considered using private messages to myself as a diary. I know they will remain private.