Yes. And if you send out information via a venue like Twitter, you might expect responses that are a norm for Twitter.

> And she spams it

@'ing someone alone doth not spam make, particularly on a medium like Twitter where the default expectation is that you have a broad audience and some of them are going to talk back to you when you tweet.

Characterizing that as "spam" is no more accurate than calling a reply on HN spam.

> with a fucking vulture-like request

The gratuitous profanity and vivid imagery associated with the aspersion here do both add a certain punch, but they're even more empty than the charge of spam.

> instead of leaving the line clear for assistance...

Twitter @'s & DMs are solidly asynchronous. "Line clear" doesn't apply. And if you're going to argue "well, sifting & skipping input takes precious time & attention," feel free, I guess, because you're simply arguing that an open Twitter account is the wrong medium for reaching out to people in an emergency.