News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Why does P2P encrypted messaging still suck? by Something1234 on Tuesday April 03, 2018 @04:15PM (#16748654)
> Maybe users could pay _receive_ messages.

Pay to recieve a possibly unsolicited message?!

That's insane.

Re:Ask HN: Why does P2P encrypted messaging still suck? by aeorgnoieang on Tuesday April 03, 2018 @04:30PM (#16748805)
Yeah, even requiring users to _send_ messages probably isn't enough to prevent spam. But that's assuming something like the example I imagined, someone wanting to received encrypted messages from anonymous others.

If a user's address is private tho, then asking them to pay to receive messages should be as sensible as the degree to which they protect the distribution of their address.

Re:Ask HN: Why does P2P encrypted messaging still suck? by agrue on Tuesday April 03, 2018 @05:44PM (#16749619)
Unlimited texting as the norm is pretty new, carriers have charged for incoming and outgoing MMS since it became a thing. Same with minutes and received calls.
Re:Ask HN: Why does P2P encrypted messaging still suck? by andrewflnr on Tuesday April 03, 2018 @10:13PM (#16751314)
Getting charged to receive a message I didn't ask for was bullshit then and it's bullshit now. The difference is that people are even less likely to tolerate it now.