>> It’s informal yes, but this isn’t a place for formal writing.
>> So it’s mostly just you.
It's more likely a generational thing, so not just him/her. It's also less about formal writing than it is with familiarity.
My (older) generation typically doesn't refer to someone by their first name only unless we actually know the person.
Re:The invisibility of Sheryl Sandberg
by whatyoucantsay on Tuesday April 03, 2018 @05:42PM
(#16749604)
That is precisely why those who want to place themselves in the in crowd use first names.
Re:The invisibility of Sheryl Sandberg
by abritinthebay on Tuesday April 03, 2018 @06:42PM
(#16750096)
Perhaps it once was but it's a really common thing now so it's hardly just for that reason.
Re:The invisibility of Sheryl Sandberg
by whatyoucantsay on Tuesday April 03, 2018 @08:04PM
(#16750663)
Or perhaps narcissism and attention-seeking behaviours are "a really common thing now" and, as a consequence, referring to wealthy strangers by first name is also becoming more common.
Re:The invisibility of Sheryl Sandberg
by abritinthebay on Thursday April 05, 2018 @07:33PM
(#16769739)
No offense, but this comes across very "old man yells at cloud" or "darn kids" and I'm 37.
It’s informal yes, but this isn’t a place for formal writing.
So it’s mostly just you.