News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:MIT severs ties to company promoting fatal brain uploading by kelnos on Tuesday April 03, 2018 @03:12PM (#16748084)
All this does is get you into a philosophical debate of what constitutes "you". We don't know the answer to that. There's a similar conundrum around the idea of teleportation: if it were to work by recording the quantum state of every particle in your body, transmitting that information elsewhere, and then simultaneously creating a new copy of "you" at the destination while destroying the original, is the new copy actually "you"? No one really knows. And no one really knows if the answer to that actually matters in any real sense.
Re:MIT severs ties to company promoting fatal brain uploading by cryoshon on Tuesday April 03, 2018 @07:17PM (#16750345)
well, let's just cut the philosophical debate in half here.

"you" have a chain of consciousness that is unique to your body. you destroy that body, and that chain of consciousness ends. re-assembling it elsewhere perfectly doesn't re-start that chain. it creates a new chain which from inside of its own perspective is consistent with the original chain. and it is. but the original chain has no further consciousness, as it was destroyed.

this isn't a "nobody really knows" situation so much as a "we know, but people refuse to accept what we know" situation. the semantics of what is "you" really don't matter when faced with reality.

Re:MIT severs ties to company promoting fatal brain uploading by kelnos on Tuesday April 03, 2018 @07:57PM (#16750613)
Says who? That's just your opinion on what consciousness is.

Even if I agree with your interpretation, again, I'm not sure it matters. Perhaps my physical body dies and my brain becomes digitized and I "wake up" in a computer simulation, or perhaps in an artificial brain attached to a replacement body. Even if the new me has a new consciousness that isn't just a continuation of the old one, perhaps that's an outcome I'm ok with and welcome.