Re:Spotify opens on NYSE, valuing company at almost $30B
by kevin_thibedeau on Tuesday April 03, 2018 @02:05PM
(#16747390)
You algorithmically seed new music to those with an interest in the genre and keep the songs with higher replays around for more recommendations. With perfect knowledge of who is listening to what and their overall tastes you can cut out all the inefficiency of the current gatekeepers (labels, billboard, and corp. radio) who act as self imposed kingmakers for a few anointed acts. The cream will rise to the top naturally.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Spotify opens on NYSE, valuing company at almost $30B
by whatok on Tuesday April 03, 2018 @02:30PM
(#16747673)
This sounds terrible from a user perspective and arguably promotes certain types of music while penalizing others. As a user, if I hear more than a few songs that are terrible that were forced upon me by some algorithm, I am not going to listen to that playlist/use that service anymore. If users are the only way you are generating training data (for this supposed only self-published music world), you are going to end up with the music version of clickbait to get users' attention before they hit skip. I really cannot emphasize how bad optimizing for this would be for music.
Whatever your opinion on "current gatekeepers", some of them do provide valuable filtering services that I struggle to see how an algorithm could accurately replicate without compromising what makes music magical.
Re:Spotify opens on NYSE, valuing company at almost $30B
by maherbeg on Tuesday April 03, 2018 @02:43PM
(#16747801)
I think you could do this by pushing to users who tend to look for new artists already. There's a large set of folks that love to discover new music, and actively do so, and adding one or two new artists to promote here would be an easy way to start the network effect to other users.