Re:Lessons Learned about Pitching Investors from a First-Tim...
by blacksmythe on Wednesday September 08, 2010 @06:23PM
(#1673718)
They mention repeatedly the amount raised, I didn't see where it said at what valuation. If they were left with 75% of the company, that would have been a nice seed round. If they were left with 20% of the company, not so much.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Lessons Learned about Pitching Investors from a First-Tim...
by gaganbiyani on Wednesday September 08, 2010 @11:03PM
(#1674268)
You're right - if we gave up 80% of the company, it would be an awful raise. However, it's a pretty fair assumption that we didn't do that. We chose to take in $1M instead of $300K (which is all we needed). Why would we take in more capital if the valuation wasn't fair?
Re:Lessons Learned about Pitching Investors from a First-Tim...
by gojomo on Wednesday September 08, 2010 @11:00PM
(#1674263)
Good chance it was convertible debt; thus there's no official valuation to report. What matters are any valuation caps on the conversion and the next-round valuation.
My guess would be the seed investors have terms that are essentially like having 20-30% of the current company. Selling an effective majority stake (or anything near it) in a 'seed' round isn't a typical valley thing.