News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on DNS Performance compared: CloudFlare 1.1.1.1 x Google 8.8.8.8 x Quad9 x OpenDNS. Parent comment

Re:DNS Performance compared: CloudFlare 1.1.1.1 x Google 8.8... by dbg31415 on Monday April 02, 2018 @06:43AM (#16733542)
I always used 8.8.8.8, since I couldn't remember OpenDNS's IPs.

But just found out today that, from Sydney, OpenDNS and Cloudflare are kicking Google's ass for speed. 8.8.8.8 is on par with my ISP-default DNS.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:DNS Performance compared: CloudFlare 1.1.1.1 x Google 8.8... by jg2leet on Monday April 02, 2018 @07:47AM (#16733769)
Ever since The Great Comcast DNS Outage of 2010, I've had the OpenDNS IPs burned into my memory from telling so many people.

I like the fact that you can sign up for OpenDNS and customize some of the filtering (ads, spam/malware, etc.) They used to have crappy handling of nxdomains (by default) redirecting you to a website with ads, but I believe that's no longer the case?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:DNS Performance compared: CloudFlare 1.1.1.1 x Google 8.8... by coaxial on Monday April 02, 2018 @08:07AM (#16733850)
As250 is running a free DNS server with adblocking enabled FWIW: https://twitter.com/as250/status/790593201832857601?s=20

Pihole is also a great alternative if you have a spare raspi lying around.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:DNS Performance compared: CloudFlare 1.1.1.1 x Google 8.8... by mynameisvlad on Monday April 02, 2018 @11:22AM (#16735287)
> if you have a spare raspi lying around.

Really, if you have a spare computer of any type. I run it on a VM and it works just fine. It was made for Raspberry Pis but it'll work on any system.

[ Parent | on HN ]