News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Coffee sold in California must carry cancer warning, judge rules. Parent comment

Re:Coffee sold in California must carry cancer warning, judg... by unethical_ban on Friday March 30, 2018 @10:23AM (#16716304)
Literally every person below you mistook your post to be about the flavor or quality of bread, instead of being about the health of the consumer.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Coffee sold in California must carry cancer warning, judg... by redial on Friday March 30, 2018 @10:52AM (#16716549)
> If you like bread, sucks to be you. Bread is a filler for when better foods are scarce or too expensive.

No misinterpretation needed.

Bread is not a filler. Some people (most?) eat it because they enjoy it. They actively seek it even when "better" options are available.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Coffee sold in California must carry cancer warning, judg... by unethical_ban on Friday March 30, 2018 @10:57AM (#16716596)
His/her communication isn't the most clear, but the point being made is that bread is not healthy, and that it essential to current human population size, but the species would be better off not consuming it ideally. That it should be seen as a treat, as something to eat despite its effect on the body, not because of it.

tl;dr Paleo diet.

[ Parent | on HN ]