Re:Coffee sold in California must carry cancer warning, judg...
by craigsmansion on Friday March 30, 2018 @10:19AM
(#16716283)
The EU's cookie-law is often made light of here, but there's a difference between essential and non-essential cookies.
The non-essential cookie warnings for most intents and purposes can be read as "This site will track you".
Sites using essential cookies don't have to put up a warning.
Following third party links, I now often decide that particular content is not that important when the warning pops up. It also serves as a rudimentary filter for lower quality content.
So cookie warnings being everywhere tell me a tale about the sorry state of the Web, and not a joke about bureaucracy gone haywire.
The non-essential cookie warnings for most intents and purposes can be read as "This site will track you".
Sites using essential cookies don't have to put up a warning.
Following third party links, I now often decide that particular content is not that important when the warning pops up. It also serves as a rudimentary filter for lower quality content.
So cookie warnings being everywhere tell me a tale about the sorry state of the Web, and not a joke about bureaucracy gone haywire.