Re:Proposal: Non-cooperative goroutine preemption
by weberc2 on Thursday March 29, 2018 @10:49AM
(#16707501)
> naturally more performant
Is this true? The proposal seems to indicate that preemption is more performant? Or at least it says "no runtime overhead", which is presumably in contrast to the current implementation.
Is this true? The proposal seems to indicate that preemption is more performant? Or at least it says "no runtime overhead", which is presumably in contrast to the current implementation.