Re:61% of “Entry-Level” Jobs Require 3+ Years of Experience
by bartread on Saturday March 31, 2018 @04:40PM
(#16725070)
> You know, actually do YOUR job rather than wasting every single applicants time.
I'm not wasting anyone's time. Nobody has to do anything - you can just ignore the invitation and that's fine. I'm certainly not wasting anyone's time any more than they're wasting my time submitting a subpar application for a job they're not really that interested in.
Maybe you were having a bad day but, in case not, let me say: nobody owes you a living. Like it or not, you need to earn it.
Re:61% of “Entry-Level” Jobs Require 3+ Years of Experience
by meesterdude on Thursday March 29, 2018 @07:16PM
(#16712105)
> Apply; respond to applications with a request for a phone screen or a rejection letter. Do the phone screen. Those that pass, do a technical interview via FaceTime, then those that pass that, send them to the final round. If you reject anyone during the process, notify them immediately.
nailed it. is that really so much to ask?
Re:61% of “Entry-Level” Jobs Require 3+ Years of Experience
by bartread on Saturday March 31, 2018 @04:38PM
(#16725056)
You may not have read what I wrote properly: that is exactly what I do at the moment. (We get vastly fewer applicants.)
Thing is, that doesn't scale too well. And when you reach the point when it doesn't, you need to do something else - particularly when you have a day job to do on top of recruitment.
Look at the hiring process at Apple or Google for examples of how to do it well. Apply; respond to applications with a request for a phone screen or a rejection letter. Do the phone screen. Those that pass, do a technical interview via FaceTime, then those that pass that, send them to the final round. If you reject anyone during the process, notify them immediately.
Be respectful to the candidates and you will end up with better hires. Don’t treat them like you are doing them a favor: you aren’t.