News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Oracle Wins Revival of Billion-Dollar Case Against Google by tankenmate on Tuesday March 27, 2018 @02:46PM (#16691551)
The previous remark's point was that Java copied many C functions, inventions largely of AT&T and BSD.
Re:Oracle Wins Revival of Billion-Dollar Case Against Google by hcknwscommenter on Tuesday March 27, 2018 @05:59PM (#16693140)
I see the point, but that's "whataboutism." I also have no idea who owns the copyright (if anyone does) to stdlib APIs, and whether Oracle obtained license. Do you?
Re:Oracle Wins Revival of Billion-Dollar Case Against Google by wtallis on Tuesday March 27, 2018 @09:31PM (#16694431)
> (if anyone does)

There's no doubt that if it is established that APIs are subject to copyright, then someone owns copyright to the C standard library APIs. It's not old enough for copyright to have expired, and nobody has ever released the APIs to the public domain (because nobody ever seriously thought that such a thing would be necessary). Establishing API copyright as a real thing without broad fair use rights would throw into doubt the copyright ownership of a large portion of all software ever written.