News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook's Zuckerberg will not appear before British MPs by babuskov on Tuesday March 27, 2018 @10:24AM (#16688659)
> I wonder if regulators will just decide the split up facebook.

I keep hearing this suggestion and it makes no sense. Split into what? It would be like asking to split Google into one company doing the search and another one doing the ads. You're talking about loss leader strategy here and you cannot have a company whose only product is a loss leader. Majority of users won't pay to have search or social network. They value their privacy much lower and would trade it to get the services without direct monetary compensation.

Re:Facebook's Zuckerberg will not appear before British MPs by Slansitartop on Tuesday March 27, 2018 @10:45AM (#16688909)
> I keep hearing this suggestion and it makes no sense. Split into what?

Instagram, WhatsApp, and multiple competing Facebook copies (say Facebook Red, Facebook Green, and Facebook Orange) with a mandate to interoperate with each other and with other networks. Existing accounts are divided randomly and evenly between the copies.

Re:Facebook's Zuckerberg will not appear before British MPs by JumpCrisscross on Tuesday March 27, 2018 @10:45AM (#16688907)
> Split into what?

Here’s an easy start: Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp.

Re:Facebook's Zuckerberg will not appear before British MPs by jacquesm on Tuesday March 27, 2018 @12:23PM (#16690024)
An advertising company and the various communications platforms.
Re:Facebook's Zuckerberg will not appear before British MPs by avoidit on Tuesday March 27, 2018 @01:41PM (#16690916)
The sibling comments make it clear what the split could be. In fact, people who say #deletefacebook are both overreacting and overreaching, when a much easier solution is at hand. It should really be #splitfacebook - that is an excellent outcome for most of the concerned parties (except maybe FB shareholders, which might as well be a good thing).