News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I usually run 'w' first when troubleshooting unknown mach... by hn_user2 on Tuesday March 27, 2018 @04:17AM (#16686378)
For small stuff I still like the simple syslog. It’s usually built in and supports aggregating to a single server.

In the past have created a server just with syslog. Adjust all your servers syslog configs to point to that one. Then log in and use grep.

Not fancy. But gets the job done with a single line config change in your syslog configs.

Re:I usually run 'w' first when troubleshooting unknown mach... by arca_vorago on Tuesday March 27, 2018 @10:25AM (#16688672)
Senior sysadmin here, and I agree this is one of the most common methods. I have also had great success tying in the ossec or pam module notifications into syslog messages that all go to the central syslog (nsyslog/rsyslog etc) server. The problem with the elk and similar stacks imho is lack of security and speed. Things this old school setup doesn't have a problem with. The problem is that too many managers don't like not having gui dashboards... which is why splunk et al have really taken off.

This re-enforces my idea that a purely terminal based business dashboard might be a cool product with a fairly large market. I've been eyeballing some of the go/ncurses work for this.

Re:I usually run 'w' first when troubleshooting unknown mach... by devonkim on Tuesday March 27, 2018 @11:13AM (#16689250)
rsyslog or syslog-ng were preferred these days for better security and performance I thought? Unless you’re using something like stunnel to wrap the syslog messages that is.