News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Regulation could protect Facebook, not punish it by brrrrr on Monday March 26, 2018 @03:32AM (#16677260)
Hmmm, not quite. See, that’s the part about the boredom cure I mentioned.

People really are that bored. People’s lives are frequently very lackluster and uneventful. This is plainly obvious, because whenever someone delightfully ordinary (yet comfortable with that) comes along, it seems like such a breath of fresh air amongst all the puffed out try-hards that grab so much attention.

The cringey reality check is the depressing part that creates the anxiety of never wanting to leave the house. People have a hard time differentiating between bullshit and not bullshit.

It’s not entirely correct to blame Facebook in particular for the inadequacy felt, when comparing one’s self to someone else’s carefully currated (yet seemingly natural) photo album.

That part of the debate is just the bulemia-caused-by-waif-as-fashion-model-redux. You can’t fix that by removing Facebook from the equation, because people will never stop beautifying their profile pics and cherry picking exclusive-yet-swollen friend lists.

So we’ll cure it by all jumping ship to Mastodon, where the photo albums will be crappier and less enviable, and we’ll all be less cringey? That’s the plan?

This isn’t about elections at all, is it?

Re:Regulation could protect Facebook, not punish it by dwaltrip on Monday March 26, 2018 @10:01AM (#16678930)
That's why I mentioned broader social media in general. This problem isn't specific to Facebook alone.