> If the reporting requirements seem to be literally impossible to comply with, this doesn’t mean you conclude “so I don’t have to pay taxes”. It means you should conclude “I have to pay the maximum taxes possible under the worst case scenario because I don’t have the records to prove my version of events”.

Shouldn't that be "pay the minimum amount that (1) you can reasonably argue you believe is what you owe, and (2) is close enough to the maximum possible under the worst case scenario that you will not be subject to underpayment penalties if you are audited and they determine you owe the maximum"?