News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I'm not a spammer, I just need to blast these potential c... by peteforde on Monday September 06, 2010 @02:04AM (#1666029)
Thanks for the insanely information-dense link, Ryan.

I assure you that no bullshit was intended; the stuff in the comments directly contradicts both the account suspension emails received and the contents of the MailChimp FAQ.

A big part of the reason I posted this was to get more background information, and today you were that special someone.

Re:I'm not a spammer, I just need to blast these potential c... by ryanwaggoner on Monday September 06, 2010 @07:02AM (#1666427)
Can you post something a little more specific to your point, like the contents of the emails in question or the FAQ page where it backs up your point?

And thanks, I feel special.

Re:I'm not a spammer, I just need to blast these potential c... by peteforde on Monday September 06, 2010 @12:43PM (#1666962)
I actually don't have the emails I question, because the article is not about me or a client. They are, from what I've been told, a fairly scary sounding "one strike" template, nothing special.

The FAQ pages in question are linked prominently in the article. They have an entire section on this topic.

Re:I'm not a spammer, I just need to blast these potential c... by ryanwaggoner on Monday September 06, 2010 @08:38PM (#1667704)
Wait, you've never seen these emails?

And I checked the FAQ and didn't see anything about a 1% unsub rate resulting in account suspension or anything. Maybe I missed it? Care to point it out?

Re:I'm not a spammer, I just need to blast these potential c... by peteforde on Tuesday September 07, 2010 @12:39AM (#1668062)
The people in the article are not clients of mine. They are clients of my girlfriend — why is this a factor? I don't have access to their emails.

As for the 1% details... you missed them:

http://www.mailchimp.com/kb/article/about-warnings/

They are all over the MailChimp FAQs.

You seem kind of hostile towards me, and I'm honestly not sure why.