News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Congrats Dropbox by bbarn on Friday March 23, 2018 @12:16PM (#16659593)
It pretty much is a standard part of the OS. iCloud, OneDrive, etc.

It's the "non-proprietary" part you're not ever going to see. Someone has to pay for storage.

Re:Congrats Dropbox by vanderZwan on Friday March 23, 2018 @12:21PM (#16659651)
I think that GP's point was that a standard a la HTML or RSS should exist and be embraced by the OS. Something like Syncthing, I guess (just naming one of the first hits I got from searching, I haven't really kept up with what is being tried in this space).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syncthing

Re:Congrats Dropbox by gfodor on Friday March 23, 2018 @12:18PM (#16659621)
Don't be so sure -- IPFS provides a possible path. We will see if it works.
Re:Congrats Dropbox by sleepychu on Friday March 23, 2018 @12:23PM (#16659675)
Someone, somewhere has to pay for the disk.
Re:Congrats Dropbox by gfodor on Friday March 23, 2018 @12:24PM (#16659698)
Yes IPFS the collective internet prices and earns for contributing disk.
Re:Congrats Dropbox by sweeneyrod on Friday March 23, 2018 @12:20PM (#16659647)
It's the protocol that's non-proprietary, not the service. IP is non-proprietary but you still have to pay for servers.
Re:Congrats Dropbox by ragesh on Friday March 23, 2018 @12:18PM (#16659615)
Why would non-proprietary preclude paying for storage?
Re:Congrats Dropbox by bbarn on Friday March 23, 2018 @03:52PM (#16662025)
Because each of those is trying to profit from it, not just pay for the storage. Thus, branding, and thus, they make them private and proprietary. Is it right? No.