Re:The Myth of Authenticity Is Killing Tex-Mex
by tptacek on Thursday March 22, 2018 @12:39PM
(#16650243)
Quintessential means "perfect example", not "most".
Re:The Myth of Authenticity Is Killing Tex-Mex
by dragonwriter on Thursday March 22, 2018 @12:52PM
(#16650383)
> Quintessential means "perfect example", not "most".
Yes, but the definite article “the” is exclusive and indicates a unique status, as opposed to the indefinite article “a” which is inclusive and admits a potentially shared status.
Tex-Mex is perhaps a quintessential melting pot cuisine, but it's not the quintessential one.
Re:The Myth of Authenticity Is Killing Tex-Mex
by tptacek on Thursday March 22, 2018 @12:56PM
(#16650420)
You're saying he said Tex-mex was a "uniquely representative example" of melting pot cuisine?
Re:The Myth of Authenticity Is Killing Tex-Mex
by dragonwriter on Thursday March 22, 2018 @01:24PM
(#16650704)
You've changed from “perfect” to “representative"; while quintessence can mean either, the latter makes little sense with “the” [0] only “a”, the former makes perfect sense with “the” to refer to the concrete example best approximating an abstract ideal, and this is exactly how the construction “the quintessential X” is generally used.
[0] except in the context of some feature where the example perfectly represents the aggregate in a way no other single example does.
Not really; it's not any more of a melting pot than south-of-the-border Mexican cuisine is, or than California cuisine is (among many others.) It's just a melting pot with different sources and biases.