News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The stability implications of the US nukes' burst-height ... by adrianN on Thursday March 22, 2018 @05:20AM (#16647062)
One bomb going off by accident seems way less scary than the prospect of nuclear war.
Re:The stability implications of the US nukes' burst-height ... by roywiggins on Thursday March 22, 2018 @09:42AM (#16648540)
It depends on what the circumstances are. If communications are disrupted, nuclear forces on alert could mistake it for an attack and launch in retaliation. Daniel Ellsburg's new book details how launch authority, as a practical matter, was delegated to commanders in the field. If they thought that a war had started and they had no communications with their superiors, they would have had authority to launch on their own.
Re:The stability implications of the US nukes' burst-height ... by sgt101 on Thursday March 22, 2018 @08:00AM (#16647817)
The problem is that one bomb going of could rapidly lead to 100's - who is to say it's an accident and not a strike? Wouldn't the enemy pretend it was an accident? Why are they moving forces now? (because they realise that a bomb just went off...)