News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:YouTube Will ‘Frustrate’ Some Users with Ads So They Pay ... by WillPostForFood on Thursday March 22, 2018 @03:50AM (#16646655)
The music industry isn’t a monolith, there is an array of companies and rights holders that control over a century’s worth of recorded music. The only single party that could step in and simplify the legal morass is the government.
Re:YouTube Will ‘Frustrate’ Some Users with Ads So They Pay ... by sf2001 on Thursday March 22, 2018 @09:27AM (#16648426)
Yes, the music industry is extraordinarily complex. There are many layers of legal complexity that apply differently (consent decrees) across the industry. There are archaic rules about the source of the music.

And generally, the fact that distribution of original music is effectively a two-sided market business model (media) means music isn't worth as much until it is popular, so one method has been to give it away for free to get to that point (think demo CDs).

Spotify deserves a lot of credit for handling the mainstream content to an international user base. The business rules of serving which version of a song (two users who play the same song can be served different content because of licensing rules), accounting for the royalties to different publishers, etc... are hard enough to figure out.

Re:YouTube Will ‘Frustrate’ Some Users with Ads So They Pay ... by 0xfaded on Thursday March 22, 2018 @04:33AM (#16646844)
This doesn't prevent the industry from getting together to make their product more accessible. It didn't stop them from banding together to make it less accessible (RIAA/MPAA).
Re:YouTube Will ‘Frustrate’ Some Users with Ads So They Pay ... by tinus_hn on Thursday March 22, 2018 @05:40AM (#16647154)
The government has also already shown they can force licensing as they did for radio.