News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:YouTube and Reddit roll out new restrictions including ch... by DennisAleynikov on Thursday March 22, 2018 @02:51AM (#16646364)
This is indeed an alarming move of trying to censor gun information online is by far the most miguided approach to regulating guns I've seen thus far. There aren't inherent risks to knowing the mechanics of physical items much less channels that deal with proper handling of guns or gun communities online. You are literally moving their communities further into the deepweb and making gun ownership a nefarious thing! Optics based bans are extremely frustrating and dissapointing to memembers of both reddit and youtube.
Re:YouTube and Reddit roll out new restrictions including ch... by abraae on Thursday March 22, 2018 @03:44AM (#16646617)
Yeah, in my country you can own hunting or sporting weapons, e.g a rifle or shotgun, but it's almost impossible to posess a handgun for example, or a high capacity semi automatic weapon.

But I have a tradition with my son of sending each other links of people in other countries shooting things up with their 50 cal machine guns and the like.

I can't imagine why anyone would think that watching such things constitutes any kind of risk to anyone.

Re:YouTube and Reddit roll out new restrictions including ch... by talmand on Thursday March 22, 2018 @11:17AM (#16649339)
Because such decisions are often based on emotion and not logic.
Re:YouTube and Reddit roll out new restrictions including ch... by Frondo on Thursday March 22, 2018 @02:14PM (#16651103)
Emotion is as much a part of the human decision-making process as logic, and it's sociopathic to act as though logic is the only part that matters.

My favorite for-example: one of those old great libertarian thinkers applied libertarian principles to the parent-child relationship and decided that a law that compels a parent to feed a child is an immoral law; parents should be free to let their children starve to death.

A triumph of logic over emotion? I guess, if you're okay with a society that permits parents to let their children starve to death without consequence.

Re:YouTube and Reddit roll out new restrictions including ch... by zrobotics on Thursday March 22, 2018 @04:05PM (#16652205)
While a valid point, there are times when we need to recognize that emotional reactions are best ignored. If I get cut off in traffic, the initial emotional response might be to ram the other person's vehicle or some other violent act. While anger is perfectly valid, in this situation it would be best avoided. I mean, the recent focus on violent video games is an entirely emotional reaction, but at this point there's been enough studies conducted that we can safely conclude that no, playing violent games doesn't contribute to real world violence, so we should let logic inform our emotional reactions.
Re:YouTube and Reddit roll out new restrictions including ch... by talmand on Thursday March 22, 2018 @02:34PM (#16651322)
Indeed, emotion is part of decision making and is often the cause of the wrong decision to be made.

It is not logical to allow a child to starve to death. Using an argument that a law is immoral is more about emotion than logic.

Re:YouTube and Reddit roll out new restrictions including ch... by snerbles on Thursday March 22, 2018 @12:31PM (#16650146)
> You are literally moving their communities further into the deepweb and making gun ownership a nefarious thing!

For some, this is the intended outcome.