Re:YouTube Will ‘Frustrate’ Some Users with Ads So They Pay ...
by quadrangle on Wednesday March 21, 2018 @09:36PM
(#16644690)
Yeah, uh Brexit is held up as the second-most-terrible thing driven by the same provincialism as Trump-election. BBC is indeed great, and the NPR comparison to YouTube is nonsense. But UK didn't quite avoid disasters (caused largely by Facebook, just as here).
Re:YouTube Will ‘Frustrate’ Some Users with Ads So They Pay ...
by AndrewUnmuted on Wednesday March 21, 2018 @08:42PM
(#16644241)
I'm no fan of YouTube, but to be fair to them, it's probably not so much about maximizing profit as it is an effort to avoid the wrath of the RIAA.
Re:YouTube Will ‘Frustrate’ Some Users with Ads So They Pay ...
by jadedhacker on Wednesday March 21, 2018 @09:11PM
(#16644501)
Not to be pedantic, but even if that's true, the RIAA is advocating for the profit seeking motives of the labels it represents.
NPR used to be publicly funded, much like the BBC in the UK. The idea was to offer objective journalism for the strength of democracy. It has helped a lot in the UK may have helped prevent the current disaster we now experience in the US. When that public funding started being removed, NPR had to start acting more like a private company, satisfying target demographics and seeking seeking donor support.
So, NPR pledge drives are in large part them trying to maintain an objective perspective. A feeble attempt, sure, but they are trying. Youtube is merely maximizing profit.