100% means it's always true for everyone. It's not reliably true for anyone, though it's sometimes true, and it's more likely to be true for certain people.

I am objecting to the “100%” characterization, and pointing out that reality is much more complex than that.

Hmm ok. That's an odd thing to take issue with. I guess you'll take the risk next time you're being questioned?

Edit: It doesn't matter if I'm not statistically correct, the question is whether you would take the risk that, no, they're not out to get you if they're questioning you for something serious... Seems a bad calculation.

Well, it depends. I mean, when I was last questioned by a CHP officer about an auto accident recently, sure, I took the risk that the officer wasnt looking to frame me for a crime and answered questions fully, completely, and accurately, and even volunteered information (even though I was at fault for the accident, and knew it.)

But, you know, different circumstances—or even different questions—and it might have gone differently.

There isn't much to do about an auto accident, not even in the same ballpark.

It isn't odd to take issue with the bit's that is wrong.