Re:Police chief: Uber self-driving car “likely” not at fault...
by zlynx on Tuesday March 20, 2018 @01:09PM
(#16630468)
Who just walks out in front of headlights on a dark street at night? Who DOES THAT?
This appears to me to be a suicide.
Re:Police chief: Uber self-driving car “likely” not at fault...
by TheGrumpyBrit on Tuesday March 20, 2018 @01:31PM
(#16630672)
Suicidal people wouldn't typically try to take their bicycle and their shopping with them. But honestly, the reason she was there isn't really important. The reason the Uber couldn't avoid her is a far more important question in terms of where we go from here. It should have detected her as a potential hazard. It should have been prepared to stop. It shouldn't have been exceeding the speed limit.
A good driver will look back at what they did after an accident to see if they could have done anything to prevent it, even if they weren't at fault. Uber need to do exactly the same thing. Fortunately, unlike a human driver, they have significantly more data than an adrenaline-fuelled mind and some grainy dashcam footage to work with.
I'll forgive a human driver for not noticing a pedestrian and reacting in a quarter of a second. But all the marketing videos have trained us to hold an autonomous car to a higher standard. Certainly a lack of lighting isn't an excuse. The car should have known she was there, identified her as a potential hazard, and been prepared to take appropriate action should her course change. Speeding, along with the fact that the car made no attempt to stop before the collision, is a "back to the drawing board" level of failure.