Re:Facebook Security Chief Said to Leave After Clashes Over ...
by anigbrowl on Monday March 19, 2018 @07:12PM
(#16624250)
When police are involved that's one of those 'get in line' situations. I suspect the UK authorities are far more worried about the potential for destruction of evidence that they are in hampering an 'investigation' by FB.
Re:Facebook Security Chief Said to Leave After Clashes Over ...
by Applejinx on Monday March 19, 2018 @07:57PM
(#16624615)
I would think it was very likely that Facebook itself seeks to destroy evidence. They've got a much clearer sense of their culpability than any outsider would.
Re:Facebook Security Chief Said to Leave After Clashes Over ...
by Consultant32452 on Monday March 19, 2018 @09:49PM
(#16625316)
No, when police are involved that's one of those 'maximally invoke your rights' situations. The police are the enemy. Get whatever brigade of lawyers you can afford and stop their efforts in any way you can. This is true whether you're an unfortunate person who happened to be driving while black or a multinational corporation.
Re:Facebook Security Chief Said to Leave After Clashes Over ...
by stickdogg on Tuesday March 20, 2018 @07:05AM
(#16627453)
One can only hope that is the case.
Re:Facebook Security Chief Said to Leave After Clashes Over ...
by rhizome on Monday March 19, 2018 @07:34PM
(#16624444)
From what I've read, CA wasn't Facebook's customer. CA bought the data from a researcher who was authorized to slurp the data.
Re:Facebook Security Chief Said to Leave After Clashes Over ...
by arca_vorago on Monday March 19, 2018 @09:02PM
(#16624991)
Interesting, do you have a source on that. I would like to see the agreement researchers have to agree to to use fb data. I'm guessing this includes private profile information not public? Or is it a platform level EULA or something like that?
I wonder how FB views public scraping. Shades of webcrawlers.
Re:Facebook Security Chief Said to Leave After Clashes Over ...
by phy6 on Monday March 19, 2018 @09:23PM
(#16625141)
NY Time article "The technique had been developed at Cambridge University’s Psychometrics Center. The center declined to work with Cambridge Analytica, but Aleksandr Kogan, a Russian-American psychology professor at the university, was willing.
Dr. Kogan built his own app and in June 2014 began harvesting data for Cambridge Analytica."
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/19/technology/facebook-cambr...
Re:Facebook Security Chief Said to Leave After Clashes Over ...
by arca_vorago on Monday March 19, 2018 @11:19PM
(#16625762)
Thank you.
Re:Facebook Security Chief Said to Leave After Clashes Over ...
by celticninja on Monday March 19, 2018 @06:55PM
(#16624109)
if there has been a breach of the law that takes precedence over contract law. If a criminal prosecution takes place and results in a conviction then it makes the civil case a much easier win (and less costly to as the government is doing the majority of the work).
Re:Facebook Security Chief Said to Leave After Clashes Over ...
by prepend on Monday March 19, 2018 @07:13PM
(#16624261)
Obstructing justice or going against a legal order takes precedence over contract law. But pretty much all laws take precedent over contract when the contract is in conflict.
Facebook at CA isn’t illegal in and of itself. The important factor will be what they were doing.
And if the collaboration is doing something illegal, obviously personnel from both companies should be charged. And FB can do whatever investigation it wants (as long it's legal) and the authorities are free to ignore their findings.