Re:Self-driving Uber car kills Arizona woman crossing street
by monochromatic on Monday March 19, 2018 @02:36PM
(#16621588)
Airplane (and car, for that matter) malfunctions can already kill travelers. Why not apply existing principles from those types of cases?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Self-driving Uber car kills Arizona woman crossing street
by SolarNet on Monday March 19, 2018 @03:20PM
(#16622122)
Because those vehicles have licensed human operators. The malfunctions may be to blame on the manufacturer, but are also licensed and regulated. The cars have to pass certain crash test standards for example.
In this case, the operator was an AI that was negligent and it was unlicensed/unregulated. That's a new scenario. In the human case a person might go to jail for negligent vehicular manslaughter. What does 2 years of jail time look like to an AI? What does a suspended license look like to an unlicensed entity?
Re:Self-driving Uber car kills Arizona woman crossing street
by monochromatic on Tuesday March 20, 2018 @10:08AM
(#16628652)
Iām specifically talking about the case where the operator is not at fault.