News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Xpra is screen for X applications by nl on Saturday September 04, 2010 @08:09AM (#1662546)
Mmmm.. ec2 instance running X+Xpra+FreeNX Server, then NX on the client and you have your desktop anywhere.

(X on EC2: http://blog.decaresystems.ie/index.php/2007/05/23/amazon-web...)

(FreeNX: http://freenx.berlios.de/)

Re:Xpra is screen for X applications by houseabsolute on Saturday September 04, 2010 @01:23PM (#1663008)
Hmm, this actually works just fine for me with only NX client. What advantage does Xpra bring to the table?
Re:Xpra is screen for X applications by _delirium on Saturday September 04, 2010 @03:08PM (#1663199)
Or just Xpra, for that matter--- Xpra was written as a replacement for NX (http://lwn.net/Articles/343389/), and they have heavily overlapping functionality, so it seems odd to use both rather than picking one.
Re:Xpra is screen for X applications by steve19 on Saturday September 04, 2010 @08:08PM (#1663704)
Does Xpra offer the same level of compression as NX?

NX is designed to work fast over low bandwidth connections.

Re:Xpra is screen for X applications by StavrosK on Saturday September 04, 2010 @09:42PM (#1663823)
It doesn't look like it. If you need a remote desktop, NX is the way to go, in my opinion. However, I do use Xpra for long-running programs because I don't want to have a full-blown X server running all the time.
Re:Xpra is screen for X applications by StavrosK on Saturday September 04, 2010 @09:45PM (#1663826)
I used Xpra today to run a small console program on my headless server, and I attached to it from my laptop. It worked very well, until I changed my ssh port to some nonstandard one. Bye-bye, attach functionality...

Does anyone know of a way to specify the ssh port?

Re:Xpra is screen for X applications by rwolf on Saturday September 04, 2010 @11:35PM (#1663942)
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg002... seems to indicate there is no current way to specify nonstandard ssh port.
Re:Xpra is screen for X applications by StavrosK on Sunday September 05, 2010 @12:06AM (#1663970)
Ah, too bad :/ Thanks for the info!
Re:Xpra is screen for X applications by luu on Saturday September 04, 2010 @09:54AM (#1662690)
See http://shifter.devloop.org.uk/ if you want to connect to a *nix/BSD box from Windows with Xpra (cygwin doesn't have an Xpra package)
Re:Xpra is screen for X applications by ScottBurson on Saturday September 04, 2010 @04:16PM (#1663317)
I use Xpra, but it's a little buggy. E.g., buttons don't always appear in the right position within a dialog. Sometimes it hangs up and I have to restart it. Some fairly complex apps don't like to run under it (I think I had this problem with IntelliJ IDEA, which also isn't entirely happy under VNC/twm). Also, running XEmacs under Xpra is a bit slow for some reason.

I use VNC day in and day out, and Xpra has not replaced VNC for me, though I originally thought it might. The rootless model is cool.

Re:Xpra is screen for X applications by mgunes on Saturday September 04, 2010 @08:26AM (#1662570)
Something similar, with Telepathy: http://marnanel.dreamwidth.org/134350.html
Re:Xpra is screen for X applications by positr0nic on Saturday September 04, 2010 @12:34PM (#1662934)
How is this different from simply using NX?
Re:Xpra is screen for X applications by signa11 on Saturday September 04, 2010 @01:04PM (#1662983)
check the "What about NX?" at xpra-faq [ http://code.google.com/p/partiwm/source/browse/README.xpra ]
Re:Xpra is screen for X applications by johnitsagal on Saturday September 04, 2010 @07:03PM (#1663606)
Wow is using NX without a commercial license really that painful? We use it at work amd it's great; much snappier than VNC.

Xpra sounds great but I'm concerned about the lack of support for various features, and -judgung from the FAQ- the author's perception that they're not important.

Re:Xpra is screen for X applications by _delirium on Sunday September 05, 2010 @02:12AM (#1664115)
Yeah, the open-source version of NX isn't really ready to run; it's just a GPL'd library of the core functionality. The FreeNX project produced a working, distributable version (http://freenx.berlios.de/), but it seems to have lost steam--- no releases since 2008. There's also a reimplemented version from Google, though it's not actively developed anymore either: http://code.google.com/p/neatx/