News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:There is a Horse in the Apple Store by philk on Saturday September 04, 2010 @12:23AM (#1662019)
I'm not sure how being fitted with two entirely standard pieces of tack (a breastplate and a bridle) counts as horrible abuse.
Re:There is a Horse in the Apple Store by HeyLaughingBoy on Sunday September 05, 2010 @05:44PM (#1665249)
Actually it looks like it's just wearing a halter. I think what looks like another piece of tack is just coloration.

In any case this is not abuse (is he a troll or just ignorant?). I've rarely had trouble getting a halter on a horse except for one who doesn't like his ears being touched. My take is that if an animal that's basically 1,100 lbs of muscle (OK,not that one :-) lets you do something, it's not too bothered by it! Horses have absolutely no problem letting you know when they're pissed.

Re:There is a Horse in the Apple Store by Charuru on Saturday September 04, 2010 @09:30AM (#1662647)
How would you like it if I put a bridle on your face.
Re:There is a Horse in the Apple Store by ptomato on Sunday September 05, 2010 @01:40AM (#1664082)
Animals are not people.
Re:There is a Horse in the Apple Store by zackattack on Saturday September 04, 2010 @09:58AM (#1662700)
I'm completely with you, but this is not the right place for this discussion. Lead by example (adopt a 100% cruelty-free lifestyle) and let your influence slowly trickle out through your social network.
Re:There is a Horse in the Apple Store by Charuru on Saturday September 04, 2010 @04:09PM (#1663307)
I'm not so concerned about the issue that I am willing to agitate on a tech forum, but when I see this I feel bodily distress.

I am not so pleased to see an argument for the banality of evil on what is normally a bastion of liberal hipster moral righteousness either.

Re:There is a Horse in the Apple Store by pyre on Saturday September 04, 2010 @04:41AM (#1662322)
Well, now we're talking in terms of relativity. You're saying that it's not 'horrible abuse' because it is standard treatment, but this says nothing of whether or not standard treatment is 'horrible abuse.' For example,

   The Jews that weren't killed in the concentration camps "didn't have
  it so  bad" compared to the ones were. But this says nothing of whether
    or not overall treatment of Jews in concentration camps was good or bad.
Re:There is a Horse in the Apple Store by philk on Saturday September 04, 2010 @06:32AM (#1662456)
I'm saying that it's not "horrible abuse" because:

a) I've spent a reasonable amount of time around horses;

b) Can see nothing in that photo to suggest the horse has been mistreated or is distressed; and

c) Find this kind of trivialization of animal abuse by someone who has little experience with horses to be offensive nonsense.

There's real "horrible abuse" out there, and this is most emphatically not an example of it.

Re:There is a Horse in the Apple Store by samstokes on Saturday September 04, 2010 @09:14AM (#1662624)
Whoa, I never expected Godwin to show up in a discussion thread about a horse.
Re:There is a Horse in the Apple Store by pyre on Sunday September 05, 2010 @04:28AM (#1664223)
Godwin's law only applies when calling someone a Nazi or comparing someone to a Nazi(s). Godwin doesn't cover the word 'Nazi' or 'Jew' turning up in a discussion.