Re:An Analysis of the Impact of Arbitrary Blockchain Content...
by zone411 on Monday March 19, 2018 @09:39AM
(#16618233)
Not too long ago, I checked the number of images that were posted on the Ethereum blockchain and I also posted a test image (https://etherscan.io/tx/0x3ee5575306ddc235b0586984172888b47e...). There were 74 images with headers that appeared as jpg, gif, or png already posted before my test image. It's very easy to post to the Ethereum blockchain: just convert back and forth from file to hex using a site like http://tomeko.net/online_tools/hex_to_file.php?lang=en. You might also have to calculate how much gas will be used. I opened a few images and I saw a couple selfies but the oldest jpeg is a certain infamous image from 1999 that I don't think anybody cares to see. I anticipated the chance of illegal images (though it's not exactly a novel idea so I figured somebody would notice it has happened by now if an illegal image has been on the blockchain for a while), so I haven't opened others.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:An Analysis of the Impact of Arbitrary Blockchain Content...
by wakkaflokka on Monday March 19, 2018 @10:00AM
(#16618371)
Does etherscan let you search the "Input Data" of a transaction? I can see somebody building a script to parse the blockchain for image headers and convert the hex to a file now that this 'idea' has hit the mainstream. Going to be interesting to see what happens with this.
Re:An Analysis of the Impact of Arbitrary Blockchain Content...
by zone411 on Monday March 19, 2018 @10:03AM
(#16618383)
I wrote the script to parse the Ethereum blockchain from a local copy myself.
Re:An Analysis of the Impact of Arbitrary Blockchain Content...
by nosuchthing on Monday March 19, 2018 @03:20PM
(#16622123)
Goatse?