AMD is always working on random half-assed attempts to get to parity with NVidia for neural network training.
If they'd chosen one approach 5 years ago and put decent resources behind it they might be competitive by now.
If they'd chosen one approach 5 years ago and put decent resources behind it they might be competitive by now.
Edit: OK I was reading the docs, I think I got it: hipDNN is a wrapper that (once finished) will search and replace calls (from cuDNN to hipDNN), then hipDNN itself, in turn, will call MIOpen, not sure if that's right, I would appreciate if someone who knows more could confirm