Why do you think panpsychism "ought to be treated as a reductio"?
Why do you believe panpsychism deserves less time than it receives?
Re:The Best Books on the Philosophy of Mind
by hackinthebochs on Sunday March 18, 2018 @04:07PM
(#16614009)
I'm not the OP, but I think the problems with panpsychism are that 1. it creates more problems than it solves (the combination problem and its sub-problems), 2. it's anti-parsimonious, 3. it follows a poor track record of philosophers assuming the mysterious thing in question is fundamental (i.e. ontologically basic) and being proven wrong. Don't know why people insist on making that same mistake.
To clarify, panpsychism is still a very small minority position.