Re:Tim Berners-Lee shares his disappointment on World Wide W...
by QasimK on Sunday March 18, 2018 @07:34AM
(#16611459)
Can I share my low-quality disappointment that the primary article image is a 1.1MB PNG of (I assume) Tim Berners-Lee. No wonder it loaded slowly.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Tim Berners-Lee shares his disappointment on World Wide W...
by icebraining on Sunday March 18, 2018 @08:09AM
(#16611569)
Only because you have a hires screen. It uses srcset to select an appropriately-sized image (my browser loads a 650KB version).
Re:Tim Berners-Lee shares his disappointment on World Wide W...
by sametmax on Sunday March 18, 2018 @08:20AM
(#16611604)
Since when having a hi-res screen mean very fast internet ? My laptop has a higher res than my desk screen and I'm reading this from the crappy airport wifi.
Re:Tim Berners-Lee shares his disappointment on World Wide W...
by extra88 on Sunday March 18, 2018 @08:56AM
(#16611736)
The responsive images standard doesn't try to deliver the best image for your network but the best image for your display. I don't know where things stand regarding browsers sharing network quality information, it's harder and may have privacy implications.
You have control of your browser to improve your experience in poor network situations, you could set it to not load images by default or use your browser's responsive design mode to make it lie about your screen's pixel density.
Re:Tim Berners-Lee shares his disappointment on World Wide W...
by Agathos on Sunday March 18, 2018 @08:36AM
(#16611660)
At exactly what resolution does it begin to make sense to encode a photograph as a PNG instead of a JPEG?
Re:Tim Berners-Lee shares his disappointment on World Wide W...
by emilfihlman on Sunday March 18, 2018 @08:46AM
(#16611697)
Pretty much never.