News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Game of Everything, Part 1: Making Civilization by WJW on Friday March 16, 2018 @04:16PM (#16603705)
It's funny, I liked SMAC exactly because it did not have any historical baggage. This allowed it to have more "pure" leaders and historical projects (I can still quote Prokhor Zakharov and Chairman Yang by heart) in a way that regular Civ never could, because historical leaders just can't embody an ideal quite as purely as a fictional character. It also allowed for a "story", even though in hindsight it was pretty thin, which is not really possible in regular civ because we pretty much know how it ends...
Re:The Game of Everything, Part 1: Making Civilization by eropple on Friday March 16, 2018 @04:19PM (#16603725)
Sure. I'm saying, SMAC made much more sense to me after playing a Civ game to which I could draw analogies.
Re:The Game of Everything, Part 1: Making Civilization by isostatic on Saturday March 17, 2018 @11:47AM (#16607456)
Oddly I could never get into SMAC.