Re:De-anonymizing programmers from executable binaries
by Erlangolem on Friday March 16, 2018 @09:01AM
(#16600331)
Has it ever been floated that it might have been the work of an intelligence agency, as a means to fund black bag operations? It seems unlikely, but possible.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:De-anonymizing programmers from executable binaries
by jstanley on Friday March 16, 2018 @09:36AM
(#16600502)
Yes, it's also been floated that it's the work of a super-intelligent AI that needed a system of money that it could use without providing identification documents.
The internet is a vast network where the individual components don't understand the whole, just like a brain is. How do we know the internet itself hasn't turned into a super-intelligent AI already?
Re:De-anonymizing programmers from executable binaries
by Erlangolem on Friday March 16, 2018 @10:11AM
(#16600749)
I’m sensing just a bit of sarcasm, and an implied, “no you paranoid noodlebrain.” Honestly, I don’t blame you, my head is actually full of noodles.
Al dente, baby.
Re:De-anonymizing programmers from executable binaries
by jstanley on Friday March 16, 2018 @10:17AM
(#16600792)
Not sarcastic! I think your suggestion was quite reasonable, I was just offering another suggestion that I found interesting. Albeit a slightly-more implausible one :)
Re:De-anonymizing programmers from executable binaries
by Erlangolem on Friday March 16, 2018 @10:43AM
(#16600982)
Alright, glad to hear it, although I maintain that I’m still a noodlebrain. I’m guessing that you have, but you might enjoy Ghost In The Shell, which runs along a similar premise to what you’re talking about.