Re:Quicklisp - The upcoming solution to Common Lisp's "libra...
by agentultra on Friday September 03, 2010 @12:17PM
(#1660072)
Will do.
Maybe testing can just start with a TAP library.
POD-like documentation would be a little harder with reader-macros. Maybe a syntax can be defined that doesn't step on too many toes...
Either way, I'll be taking a look at it ASAP. Cheers.
I have lots of ideas for more metadata that can be gathered automatically or semi-automatically. It should be straightforward if time-consuming to set up automatic testing, even if it's as simple as "Does library foo compile and load on implementation bar on operating system baz?" Same with gathering data to answer questions like "What foreign libraries are needed for this project?" or "What is the license for this project?"
If you'd like to give the early version a try, drop me an email ([email protected]) or visit freenode #quicklisp.