> correctly-written documentation (which Git's is not)

How does git's documentation fundamentally differ from tools like ffmpeg or grep? That is, what makes it incorrect? I've read through those man pages and have been able to figure out how to use the CLIs for those commands.

>> We don't expect tooling documentation to require a phd

[ ... ]

> Completely missing the point.

Using hyperbole doesn't help you make a point.

> enjoy playing with yourself.

You don't have to resort to using insults.