News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Brainless Embryos Suggest Bioelectricity Guides Growth by maxander on Wednesday March 14, 2018 @11:55PM (#16590311)
Everything in biological systems depends on everything else; all variables are global, all methods are public, and all definitions are recursive. It's all spaghetti code- there is nothing like the separation of functionality that we impose on our designed artefacts for the sake of our limited minds. A signal needed to be sent from one place to another, and the brain has the machinery for endocrine functions already, so why not have it handle it? So while this is a quite valid and interesting result, it's not nearly as exciting as the popular press is going to make it out to be.
Re:Brainless Embryos Suggest Bioelectricity Guides Growth by jessaustin on Thursday March 15, 2018 @11:04AM (#16593432)
I appreciate the code architecture observations, but this result is exciting as hell. I am fascinated by ontogeny. Who knows? A century from now, lots of currently unimaginable things could be traced back to this.
Re:Brainless Embryos Suggest Bioelectricity Guides Growth by chopin on Thursday March 15, 2018 @05:01AM (#16591289)
It's like slapping new functionality onto the existing codebase where it fits. Selection then is your test suite. You slap on until your tests are all green.