Re:California's other drought: a major earthquake is overdue
by dv_dt on Wednesday March 14, 2018 @06:38PM
(#16588981)
A hedge fund might have motivation do it, but I don't know how one would reconcile the cross purposes of knowing the info ahead of time for stock trades vs warning the public asap.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:California's other drought: a major earthquake is overdue
by ISL on Wednesday March 14, 2018 @06:55PM
(#16589097)
One can trade and warn the public simultaneously.
If you're worried about getting claim-jumped by an HFT firm subscribed to the public-warning system, a few millisecond delay might allow for trade execution?
Re:California's other drought: a major earthquake is overdue
by dv_dt on Wednesday March 14, 2018 @07:32PM
(#16589325)
Once you plan for any delay then the ethical/financial discussion then goes to why not 0.1s or 1 second or two? It might be more ethically balanced, and less of a PR nightmare if a hedge fund were satisfied with maybe matched parallel feed and the advantage they get for just having the infrastructure to respond to a richer signal sent at the same time as the public warning. The public warning is a yes or no to send, but the feed might have added data such as uncertainty, or initial locations.. etc.