News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Security Researchers Publish Ryzen Flaws, Gave AMD 24 Hou... by chrismorgan on Tuesday March 13, 2018 @11:07PM (#16581970)
I tend to imagine that if Intel were doing this they’d do a better job of it. Even if CTS-Labs are completely legit, the way it’s been done has led to immediate suspicion of the claims and people involved, in a way that feels much more like a small group straining for attention or to make a quick buck and making a bit of a mess of it. If Intel were involved, I’d expect it to be done more professionally and simply better, so that people don’t suspect foul play and go looking for problems. It is possible for a company to deliberately obfuscate the trail by doing it this way, at the probable cost of some effectiveness (though if the claims are overblown it might perhaps be more effective this way), but it seems less likely.
Re:Security Researchers Publish Ryzen Flaws, Gave AMD 24 Hou... by chrismorgan on Wednesday March 14, 2018 @02:18AM (#16582751)
A really fun interpretation of it is AMD doing it themselves, deliberately badly, so that they can come off as the wounded party that actually have really good hardware. Risky, but probably not impossible to carry off.
Re:Security Researchers Publish Ryzen Flaws, Gave AMD 24 Hou... by tripzilch on Friday March 16, 2018 @10:53AM (#16601061)
While fun, it would also mean they would be publicly disclosing vulnerabilities in their own systems and then deliberately withholding the patch, just to put on this shpiel in order to appear as the underdog?
Re:Security Researchers Publish Ryzen Flaws, Gave AMD 24 Hou... by chrismorgan on Friday March 16, 2018 @11:02PM (#16605397)
Confirmation that the vulnerabilities are legitimate pretty much writes this one off. At the time I wrote it this wasn’t entirely clear, though it seemed probable (though even then they could have been overstated).