I know that our mere existence in this world means that we do not have absolute privacy, but that does not also mean that we can never have privacy at all. For example (slightly exaggerated) it's illegal to put cameras inside a changing room, but not illegal to put a camera at the entrance of the changing rooms. There are boundaries for which privacy should exist.

Perhaps a more apt analogy is that of a public library: The library may be public, but most state laws require that your records be kept confidential. The same goes for public education (FERPA). The same goes for healthcare (HIPPA).

If I go to a doctor, I do not expect them to send me mail that can disclose my medical history to an incidental observer, which has unfortunately happened to patients in both the UK and US, and people were rightfully angry about it (https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/sep/02/london-cl... and more recently https://www.statnews.com/2017/08/24/aetna-hiv-envelopes/). You cannot say, "well, you went to a doctor, you even paid with a credit card, and walked on a public sidewalk up to the door, so you must not care about it being private".

I believe that what Walmart did was inappropriate. Maybe not for everyone, but it is for me. (Conversely, I'm quite proud of my GPA & don't mind if it is public knowledge, but my university still won't tell you what it is without my explicit permission, because this kind of information does adversely affect some people, and is therefore protected by FERPA.) Unfortunately, I'm just a single individual and WM probably doesn't care what I think. So be it. I will still make it known, though, that I believe that they violated my privacy.

I'm not "surprised" and I don't think that I acted inconsistently. Rather, I'm frustrated at the lack of confidentiality.