News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fountain pen inks: the good, the bad, and the ugly (2011) by epx on Sunday March 11, 2018 @11:53PM (#16566104)
Put a JoWo #6 nib on it ($15) and it will write like a $150 pen.
Re:Fountain pen inks: the good, the bad, and the ugly (2011) by hungrynerd on Monday March 12, 2018 @05:05AM (#16566897)
Sometimes just flushing the chinese pens out with a little water and maybe a drop of detergent will do the trick.
Re:Fountain pen inks: the good, the bad, and the ugly (2011) by abritinthebay on Monday March 12, 2018 @04:01AM (#16566747)
I’m curious - what makes the nib “better”?
Re:Fountain pen inks: the good, the bad, and the ugly (2011) by epx on Monday March 12, 2018 @07:17AM (#16567377)
It is subjective - they feel smoother, glass-like. One factor is most cheap Chinese nibs are not cut exactly at the middle. This can be seen with a 10x+ loupe. The metal is not as hard. Different metal types have different surface tension so it affects ink flow. It works without adjustment while most Chinese nibs need adjustment, alignment and polishing (which is fun in itself to do).

The original Jinhao pen nib is quite usable, but the other parts of e.g. a x750 pen are much better, so it is a popular mod to change the nib for a German one, or a Japanese Zebra G flexible nib.

I have recently bought a Lecai Chinese pen and the nib seemed to be flawless. These guys in the right track on making a 100% Chinese upper quality pen.

Re:Fountain pen inks: the good, the bad, and the ugly (2011) by falcolas on Monday March 12, 2018 @12:25PM (#16569218)
Both of the sibling comments, plus good nibs don't have any rough edges which touch the paper. They've been ground/sanded down so smooth that they effectively hydroplane on the ink they're depositing.

You can improve some inexpensive nibs by simply "writing" on a high grit sandpaper or sharpening stone, but if the metal is too soft you can quickly wear away the writing surface entirely. I'd do this with the pilot disposable fountain pens with good results.

Re:Fountain pen inks: the good, the bad, and the ugly (2011) by aries1980 on Monday March 12, 2018 @06:59AM (#16567290)
Ink flow. But that can be (and should be) fine tuned even for expensive pens.
Re:Fountain pen inks: the good, the bad, and the ugly (2011) by nasredin on Monday March 12, 2018 @06:48AM (#16567249)
Why can't Chinese marketers come up with Western-sounding brand names?

This is so annoying.

They may be a better value, but European brands give you peace of mind.

Re:Fountain pen inks: the good, the bad, and the ugly (2011) by amluto on Monday March 12, 2018 @11:09AM (#16568631)
Like “Canadian Solar”?

I’d prefer my Chinese products to be honestly Chinese. Write clear marketing copy, give a specification written in decent English without random Chinese characters interspersed, and you’ll have some happy English-speaking customers.

Re:Fountain pen inks: the good, the bad, and the ugly (2011) by LyndsySimon on Monday March 12, 2018 @02:29PM (#16570257)
I agree to an extent, but I think it's mostly an issue of branding. Consider that Japanese brands were once associated with poor quality, but as their quality improved their brands became better known.

Chinese pens have been greatly increasing in quality for a few years now. Today, I recommend the Wing Sung 698 and 608 for new fountain pen users.