Re:Standardizing lessons learned from AMP
by siimtalvik on Saturday March 10, 2018 @12:52PM
(#16559398)
With difficult discussions being locked and limited to collaborators.
With the main answer to questions being, we can discuss this somewhere else, some-other (unknown) time in the future, usually in a more private setting. Unless pressed further.
Or as carmforce(Ubl) so nicely put it. "our project, our rules" but those rules keep changing, are not public and the raised issue about defining/clearing up those rules is obviously not a priority.
With the main answer to questions being, we can discuss this somewhere else, some-other (unknown) time in the future, usually in a more private setting. Unless pressed further.
Case in point: https://github.com/ampproject/amphtml/issues/13457#issuecomm...
Or as carmforce(Ubl) so nicely put it. "our project, our rules" but those rules keep changing, are not public and the raised issue about defining/clearing up those rules is obviously not a priority.
https://github.com/ampproject/amphtml/issues/13597#issuecomm...
https://github.com/ampproject/amphtml/issues/13603