News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Urbanism and Standards of Respectability by xxpor on Thursday March 08, 2018 @06:28PM (#16548645)
It's not predetermined that neighborhoods in the city aren't "family friendly" though, that's a choice we've made though policy.
Re:Urbanism and Standards of Respectability by michaelt on Thursday March 08, 2018 @07:02PM (#16548802)
Well, part of the family-unfriendliness is competition for cities' limited housing supply.

If a family with two adults and three children wants a 3-bedroom property, their budget depends on two adults' salaries minus the costs of three children.

On the other hand, if it's house-shared by four childless adults in their mid 20s, their budget is four adults' salaries, with none of the costs of children.

Re:Urbanism and Standards of Respectability by bobthepanda on Friday March 09, 2018 @01:30AM (#16550119)
Lots of cities manage to do well with children; New York is an above-average performing urban school district with a million kids enrolled.

The problem is that with the rise of housing as an investment vehicle, cities have rapidly increased in price. In most countries housing is not a high-yield investment like stocks, it's a safer, low-yield investment like bonds. REITs have managed to destroy the goal of affordable housing for most people.

Re:Urbanism and Standards of Respectability by xapata on Friday March 09, 2018 @02:50AM (#16550355)
I wouldn't blame it on REITs but the vastly greater real lifetime income of the previous generations. Wages have been declining since the 70s.