Lawful permanent residents and other residents of the US who are not eligible for a US passport may also want to avail themselves of the benefits of a credit card. Fewer than half of US Citizens have a passport, and they may all want a credit card as well.

Lawful permanent residents also have a green-card or other immigration related ID number which can serve the same purpose. They likely also possess a foreign passport which could be used in the same way.

Less than half of the eligible population of the US votes also. That doesn't mean that it's a bad idea, just that it's not taken advantage of.

EDIT: a word.

They would almost all have passports that the US government considered satisfactory though.

I don't actually have a problem with that as a solution to using a stronger ID. I still think it would need to be coupled with an additional security token or key on the passport side to complete the security, but that's a relatively simple change versus implementing a new ID system from scratch.

Although I don't think they're trying to pass the cost to the government. By calling it "identity theft" instead of what it is, fraud, they're trying to pass the cost of fraud to the consumer.

Login.gov [1], a USDS project, supports the additional auth requirement you desire.

Agree with the rest of your comment.

[1] https://login.gov/

I'll have to check that out. Thanks. :)

there are various legal reasons (e.g. parole) why you might be denied a passport that have nothing to do with whether credit should be extended to you.

Edge cases can be addressed. Still issue the passport, but put a travel hold on it. This allows for the identifier to still be generated and managed.

EDIT: After coffee, I'm even more convinced this is a good idea. Better to issue the passport and have the identifier of who you don't want to travel vs not issuing it and then losing that person in the noise....because of not having a national ID card system.

Do you consider Real ID equivalent to a passport or are you really saying we need to make 200,000,000 people get an international passport that they're likely to never use?

The word "make" makes me sigh. Is it too much trouble to get your picture taken and fill out a form? It's no different than a driver's license application process, while at the same time providing needed identification verification capabilities. The sugar on top is you're giving Americans the ability to travel internationally, which one might optimistically assume would provide some necessary perspective.

A passport should be freely provided to you by your government as part of being a citizen.

> some necessary perspective

I'd venture to guess that if you were making minimum wage and living in a place that was either a 700 mile drive or a $1000 airplane ticket from an international border, you might understand why it seems unnecessary. (Do you honestly believe that most non-traveling Americans are doing it because they don't have a passport?)